Wants Fani-Kayode barred from public office
From Alifa Daniel and Lemmy Ughegbe, Abuja
THE Senate Committee on Aviation opened a can of worms yesterday as it regaled lawmakers with details of how billions of naira was siphoned from government coffers in the aviation sector.
Though the Senate refrained from delving into certain matters that were before a court of law, the report read to members by the Chairman, Senate Committee on Aviation, Anyim Ude, recommended a five-year public office ban on a former Minister of Aviation, Femi Fani-Kayode, currently facing court charges based on "established irregularities in the award of contracts."
The Senate panel urged the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) to go after another aviation minister, a former Managing Director of the National Airspace Management Agency (NAMA), a contractor and recover N5 billion, being inflated cost of the Safe Tower project.
"In spite of efforts by groups outside the hallowed chambers of the Senate to blackmail, infiltrate, threaten, intimidate and cajole the committee, it remained focused and established," Ude told his colleagues yesterday.
Ude said that although N19.5 billion was released by the Federal Government in 2006, to finance major intervention projects of the Federal Airports Authority of Nigeria (FAAN) to the tune of N9.2 billion - Nigeria Airspace Management Agency, N7.3 billion; Nigeria Civil Aviation Authority, N2.2 billion and the Nigerian Meteorological Agency, N900 million - the distribution of the N19.5 billion fund to aviation parastatals was changed by the Ministry of Aviation to give Federal Airports Authority of Nigeria (FAAN), N13,100,956,240.07 and Nigeria Airspace Management Agency (NAMA), N6,399,043,759.35."
The Rivers State Government later released additional sum of N2 billion to FAAN for infrastructural upgrade at the Port Harcourt Airport, the panel added.
Ude disclosed further: "The N6.5 billion used for the Safe Tower project was borrowed by FAAN ostensibly on behalf of NAMA from Zenith Bank Plc out of which N6,399,043,759.35 (inclusive of letters of credit charges) was paid soon after release for the foreign component. NAMA claimed that it was neither consulted nor did it participate in any negotiation for the loan. The hurried nature of the release and payment was attributed to the need to meet the requirements of the International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO) audit team scheduled to visit Nigeria in November 2006."
Among other findings of the committee were:
"That half of the N6.5 billion was later refinanced by UBA Plc;
"That the Safe Tower project cost the nation N6,699,043,759.35 made up of N6,399,043,759.35 foreign component and N300,000,000 local content;
"That the N6.5 billion Tower project was awarded through selective tendering process (not advertised and not competed for);
"That the N6.5 billion Tower project had no Bill of Quantities or a detailed listing with specifications of items to be delivered by the contractor;
"That no due process was followed and the contract was grossly inflated;
"That the company which operated as consultants, did the initial survey, determined the scope of work and fixed the contract price was the same company that was awarded the contract;
"That the company is Avsatel Ges MBII Vienna, Austria and Abuja;
"That the N6.5 billion expenditure on the Safe Tower project was not appropriated by the National Assembly either before, during or after the contract;
"That the highest quotation received by the Technical Consultant to the Senate Committee on Aviation during the investigation for the same four Towers from both Viasala and Frequenties of Vienna, the manufacturers, and other companies was N1.5 billion at 100 per cent mark-up;
"That the current management of NAMA, in the 2008 Budget had a provision of N1.5 billion for the same four towers in four other airports in the country (same specification, quantity and quality); _
"That the current management of NAMA has indeed received quotations which were tendered as exhibits to the committee, one of which was from Viasala and Frequenties, the manufacturers of the four towers under reference for N1.3 billion for the same specifications as that of the N6.5 billion Tower project;
"That the N6,699,043,759.35 Tower project was grossly over- inflated to about 446.6% above the market price of N1.5 billion;
"That Due Process was not followed in the award of the contract. The fake Due Process Certificate said to have been issued by the Bureau of Public Procurement should be investigated by the EFCC which should also find out why no Certificate of Payment was ever issued by the Bureau and no request to that effect was made by the Ministry;
"That as at February, 2008, one and a half years after the loan was obtained, the cost of the N6.5 billion in commercial bank Loan servicing to the Federal Government stood at N1,438,788,496.06 (One billion, four hundred and thirty eight million, seven hundred and eighty eight thousand, four hundred and ninety six hundred and six kobo);
The Senate committee also listed 20 companies which had a combined share capital of less than N21million but were given combined contracts worth about N10 billion.
The panel, therefore, recommended that: